Month: April 2021 (Page 1 of 3)

Letter from Rev. Gretchen regarding School Resource Officers

Dear Foothills Community and beyond, 

As some of you may be aware, the Community Advisory Committee tasked with evaluating safety in Poudre School District, and specifically, the presence of the Student Resource Officers (SROs) provided their final report a few days ago. As some of you may also be aware, Rev. Sean has served as a part of this Committee, and so we have been able to have a close-up awareness of its work.  

After a thorough process, the CAC was not able to reach a full consensus, although a majority came to believe that it was ultimately harmful to keep SROs in schools. They provide many recommendations beyond this point. I’d encourage you to read their entire report, especially since there are currently broad mischaracterizations and misunderstandings circulating regarding the CAC’s work. You can find their full report here.  

These mischaracterizations and misunderstandings have been especially lodged at members of the Committee, especially the people of color serving on the CAC.  They have been targeted online and in their comments to the School Board alleging that the process is fraudulent, and attacking their character and legitimacy.  There is also a campaign directed towards the School Board via letters and online comments to ensure that the status quo is maintained and the CAC’s report disregarded based on a survey sent to PSD parents. 

As a person of faith and a religious leader, I believe it is imperative that we create structures and communities that listen and respond not to the loudest voices, or even the majority of voices, but most closely to the voices and experiences of the most vulnerable among us. As Christian scripture would say, the “least of these.”  

Especially in our schools, we need to listen to the voices of immigrants and people of color, and to those who know first-hand the trauma of living in a world where their very existence has been targeted by those in power for generations.  

I start here because the voices of those pointing to the results of surveys where a large majority support the continued presence of SROs are extremely loud, and could be superficially quite persuasive. But we can’t let these loud voices claiming the imperative of majority rules be confused with a moral imperative.  Now is the time to claim a path of moral courage.  

When the data clearly show the impact of SRO’s presence on students of color in our schools, and when the history of policing is objectively tied to racism and white supremacy, and today is a key component in the school-to-prison pipeline, the moral and ethical path is clear. We need to remove SROs from our schools and instead focus our funding priorities on counselors and other trauma-informed supports for mental health for our children. While there are undeniably many instances of positive experiences with SROs, and we all believe in ensuring our children are as safe as possible, this is not enough to justify their continued presence every day in our schools. 

The data on SROs’ capacity to respond to emergencies is mixed, and there are other ways to ensure we have the efficiency and effectiveness of response originally intended in establishing SROs in the first place. The report from the CAC provides ample examples of the needs and opportunities to better serve our students, and our District needs to pursue and prioritize these recommendations. If you agree, I hope you will join me in lending your voice in support by writing to the School Board and/or posting your support online or in a letter to the Coloradoan.  

Especially after this year, when so many of us have experienced firsthand how near trauma may be for any of us, and how stressed our children and school communities may be. We need to respond with resources that heal and transform this trauma rather than magnify it or simply pass it on to another generation.  

It will not be easy to resist the loud voices pointing to the surveyed “yes column” of the majority. It will also not be easy to disregard some of our personal experiences with SROs that we like and have found valuable. But this is not ultimately what matters most. But now is the time to hold steady, and trust in a deeper value and a deeper truth that listens to and protects the marginalized and creates a system that puts the needs of the most vulnerable first. Many of us have participated in calls for racial justice over this last year, and have called for urgent reform. Removing SROs from our schools is one way to show that when we hold up signs saying Black Lives Matter, we actually mean it.  

In partnership,

Rev. Gretchen Haley
Senior Minister 
Foothills Unitarian Church

Update on Post-Pandemic Church Plans (April 2021)

I’m just a few days from my second vaccine’s “full effect” date, and I can’t wait. I already have in-person get-togethers set for most of the following few days, not to mention a haircut. 

I know not everyone is as eager as I am to launch back into non-Zoom life, but in the last few weeks, things have started to shift significantly for a lot of us. Vaccines have become widely available for anyone over the age of 16, and we have a hunch that the Foothills community has a very high percentage of us already or almost fully vaccinated.  

Will you help us confirm (or refute) our hunch by filling out this totally anonymous survey about your vaccine status? It will help us better plan and understand how our plans will be received in the coming weeks and months.

So much has shifted recently, and also, a lot hasn’t. Specifically, the infection rates haven’t changed much. We’re holding steady in our County at rates just about where we were around Halloween. This means we’re nowhere near the extreme highs of December and January, but we’re also very far away from the lower numbers we saw a year ago in May 2020.  

The combination of high infection rates with high vaccine availability creates a public health conundrum, especially for places like churches that serve the general public or multi-generational communities given those under age 16 aren’t yet eligible for a vaccine.  

We don’t really know what this will mean, but we do know that getting more people vaccinated is imperative for all of us to return to a sense of normalcy. If you know anyone who is not vaccinated, please make sure they sign up with the County for a fast vaccine appointment here 

With all that said, we have been moving forward with our plans for in-person gatherings. To start, I’m happy to offer these updated Guidelines for Gatherings – geared especially to all of you who lead groups, circles, or teams and who are consider getting together in the next few months – but also to give you all a sense of how we as staff are thinking about get-togethers. Please review and let me know your questions! 

In the last few days, we’ve begun the process of returning to and opening back up our campus, a process that will culminate in full reopening by September.  

To start, in the last week, volunteers helped us to paint and clean the building and playground. On May 22nd and 23rd, families will move out of Foothills and into Christ United Methodist, launching Faith Family Hospitality (the program through which we house families experiencing homelessness) back into their normal rotation across churches.  

This move-out will give us 2 weeks before our first big event back on the campus – Day Camp! (An all outdoor event this year.) 

During these weeks, Family Housing Network has arranged for professional deep cleaning (including carpets), along with a few other investments in the look and feel of our campus.  

On June 5th, we will host a “work day” at the church to finalize any clean-up and to plant flowers around the campus. This will be open to anyone, so look out for the sign-up coming soon! 
 

Throughout the summer, our building will remain mostly closed since we won’t yet have the systems/staff ready to operate in the way we did pre-pandemic. We will have occasional outdoor events, however, including a second Day Camp later in the summer. Given the high infection rates, waiting a few more months before being indoors together seems like due diligence after everything we’ve gone through. Besides, if you remember the temperature of our building in the summer, you’ll also remember that returning to indoor activities in the fall is just fine 🙂 

Speaking of the fall, a few key decisions are starting to shape up for our return to in-person worship. First, we are aiming for our first in-person worship on September 19th, assuming infection rates continue to fall. 

Currently, we are planning on maintaining our 9 am online service, providing a 10:15 in-person service that requires reservations (due to our limited seating), and a rebroadcast of the 9 am service at 11. Because of our space limitations, we’re thinking about a rotation of different groups on different Sundays to ensure you can come in person at least twice a month if you want to.  

We are also tentatively planning on an all-church in-person REUNION Sunday, October 17th at a rented location TBD. This all-church Sunday gathering would then repeat every third Sunday through January. Somewhere in there, the choir will sing, and we’ll have coffee! Don’t forget that somewhere in October-ish we’ll also be breaking ground on our new construction! (Learn more about the building expansion here.)

We’re trying to balance a lot of things in this plan, including:

  • the limitations of our current sanctuary size
  • the potential inclination of people to want to stay online – while also recognizing the needs of those for whom online church doesn’t work (especially parents with younger kids at home)
  • the gifts we’ve discovered in the online format
  • the reality that we can’t do everything (unless we hire double our staff!)
  • the fact that in a year, we’ll have a whole new sanctuary so anything we do now is automatically temporary! …. and, as I said in the last update, there’s a lot we won’t know until we start trying it. 

Even what I’ve outlined here remains only loosely determined, with a lot still to be worked out. So take this in and then let me know your questions and reactions. We will learn our way to the next right thing, together. In the meantime, I’m looking forward to seeing you all online, or outdoors at a gathering sometime soon! 

With love, and in partnership,

Gretchen  

The Building Bulletin April 2021

We have our final design!

Not really – now comes the hard part, making sure the building is structurally sound, figuring out where wiring and ductwork goes, and a million other details. Ewers Architecture spent a lot of time in March reviewing comments from the February congregational meeting, holding information sessions, and talking to the BET and staff. They even brought a ladder to the grounds so they could look at the view from the height of the new building and take a lot of pictures. We feel this design is a wonderful answer to many of the concerns brought up at the meetings. We hope you agree. You can view the new plans here.

Celebrate our trees!

One of the unfortunate aspects of expanding our building is the loss of some trees. The Climate Justice Ministry decorated the trees that will be gone, so you can visit the grounds, acknowledge their loss, and appreciate their contribution to our surroundings. 

We will be remediating the loss by replanting on our grounds or paying for the city to replant elsewhere.  There may be an option for yard trees planted by congregants who live within ½ mile of the church to count towards our remediation, so stay tuned for more information soon if you live within a ½ mile of the church and are looking to plan a new tree in your yard!

Looking Back

When Peter Ewers and Ann Ormsby came to assess the view, we took the opportunity to survey our sidewalks. The city would like five-foot sidewalks with a separation from the street. This would necessitate losing more trees and shrubs and would encroach on our usable space.  After several discussions, the city has signaled that they would entertain a modified proposal.  We walked around our part of the block with the architects and our landscape architect and came up with options. The civil engineer consulting for Ewers Architecture will write a proposal that we hope the city will accept. Keep your fingers crossed!

The next week was spent in several input-gathering sessions with staff, congregants, and the Architects. Those interested attended meetings focused on Worship, Sanctuary, Sound and AV, Choir, and Family Ministry. There was interesting feedback and comments. We have read them all, and the architectural team has incorporated many of them into the latest design iteration.  

On March 15, we had a meeting with the city IDAP (Integrated Design Assistance Program) coordinator and energy modeler.  We talked about options for the HVAC system, how to price alternatives, and what the city hopes to see from our building. It was an interesting discussion and gets the ball rolling with the city.

Looking Forward

This month we will meet with Pinkard Construction and Ewers architecture to firm up our schedule. We want to understand what tasks the church is responsible for and be sure we meet our deadlines.

Viewing Recommendations From Our Community

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]We might have a few rainy afternoons to fill in the next few weeks. Thank you all for submitting these recommendations! Here is the complied list of recommended viewing options from last week’s check-in:

  • 800 Words
  • A Million Little Things
  • All Marvel movies, in timeline order
  • Amend
  • Andy of Mayberry
  • Any Ken Burns documentary (2 votes)
  • Arrested Development
  • Being There
  • Blade Runner
  • Blown Away
  • Bridgerton
  • Drop Dead Diva
  • Emily in Paris
  • Finding Your Roots, with Henry Louis Gates, Jr
  • Gilmore Girls
  • Good Girls
  • Good Will Hunting
  • Great British Baking Show
  • I’m Not There
  • Lincoln
  • Modern Love (based on articles in NYT)
  • Monster Hunter
  • Moving Art (an end of day soother)
  • My Octopus Teacher (2 votes)
  • Nancy Drew
  • News of the World
  • Nomadland
  • Off the Map
  • Our Friend
  • Outlander (2 votes)
  • Peanut Butter Falcon
  • Poldark PBS
  • Prodigal Son
  • Promising Young Woman
  • Queen’s Gambit
  • Riverdale
  • Roma
  • Schitt’s Creek (2 votes)
  • Seaspiracy
  • The Atlantic Crossing
  • The Big Flower Fight
  • The DIG
  • The IT Crowd (funny)
  • The Kominsky Method
  • The Mauritian
  • The Simpsons
  • The Walking Dead
  • The West Wing
  • This is Us
  • Unorthodox
  • Wanted
  • Wings of Desire

[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

Songs for Tough Times

[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]As a follow up to the wonderful service on Sunday with our guest Melanie DeMore, we asked you to share a song or two that keeps you going through the tough times.

 

“Amazing Grace” – John Newton

“Be Not Afraid” – Bob Dufford, S.J.

“Beautiful Day” – U2

“Benedictus” from The Armed Man: A Mass for Peace

“Bridge Over Troubled Water” – Simon & Garfunkel

“Dama de Mis Amores” – Ray Sepulveda and Tito Nieves

“Ding Dong! The Witch Is Dead” – Harold Arlen

“Dona Nobis Pacem” – Traditional

“Don’t Stop Believing” – Journey

“Here Comes the Sun” – The Beatles

“Here I Am Lord” – Dan Schutte

“I Am Light” – India Arie

“I Will Always Love You” – Dolly Parton

“I Will Survive” – Gloria Gaynor

“Imagine” – John Lennon

“Keep Going Song”  the Bengsons

“Landslide” – Stevie Nix

“Lean on Me” – Bill Withers

“Let it Be” – Paul McCartney

“Light At The End Of The Tunnel” – Andrew Lloyd Webber

“Light of a Clear Blue Morning” – Dolly Parton

“May I Have This Dance With You?” – Scott Krippayne

“On Eagle’s Wings” – Michael Joncas

“On the Road Again” – Willie Nelson

“Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head” – BJ Thomas

“Ripple” – Grateful Dead

“September Song” – Walter Huston

“Silent Night” – Franz Xaver Gruber

“Standing Outside the Fire” – Garth Brooks

“The Mother” – Brandi Carlile

“The River” – Garth Brooks

“This Little Light of Mine” – Harry Dixon Loes  (Sam Cooke version)

“Tomorrow” – Andrea McArdle

“We Shall Be Known” – Ma Muse

“We’ll Meet Again” – Vera Lynn

*Anything by Carol King or James Taylor[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]

« Older posts